On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 11:29:28AM +0800, Chenxiong Qi wrote: > > > On 04/25/2017 10:23 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > (adding the releng list on CC, please keep the reply on the infra list) > > > > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > Following up on the thread about pagure on the top of dist-git started a > > few days ago Ralph Bean, Matthew Prahl and I had a quick meeting just a few > > minutes ago about the future of pkgdb. > > > > Will pkgdb go away? It looks Pagure would be a data store combining package > repositories and pkgdb data together. From my point of view, pkgdb could > still sit between packagers and Pagure rather than exposing lower level data > directly as an interface of package data (whatever it comes from Pagure or > PDC) to packagers and existing tools like pkgdb-cli. If anything of my > understand about current pkgdb is not accurate, just scratch my thought :) The idea is indeed to retire pkgdb. However, I'm not sure I follow why you would prefer to keep it and what you don't like about dropping it. Could you expand your thoughts a little more? Thanks, Pierre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
