On Saturday, August 13, 2016 2:38:13 AM CDT Vivek Anand wrote: > Hi, > > I am one of GSoC students of this year and my project is to bring > pkgs.fp.org <http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/> on a pagure instance. The > script is almost ready but there is one issue which needs some advice. > > The group *provenpackagers* currently has commit rights over all the > repositories. As you might know, in pagure if some group has commit rights > on a repository, all the members of that group also has rights on the > project and it's listed as their own project. This would mean that all the > members of provenpackagers would have >18k projects of their own. > > Example: > 1. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/pingou/ > 2. https://pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/pagure/user/pingou > > (it says 1119 projects, it's under investigation at the moment.) > > pingou came out with two ideas: > > *1. Drop provenpackagers from pagure: *This would mean the proven packagers > won't get any particular advantage of shifting to pagure as they won't be > listed as admins of all the projects in the pagure db. They won't be able > to merge/close pull requests, edit a file directly via the web-interface or > execute any other admin rights on any of the repository they wish. They > would, however, have access to all the git repositories as they would be > present in gitolite conf file. They would be able to push to any of the > repositories as it is the case at present. > > *2. Create exception for provenpackagers:* This is hackish. We can give > them admin rights on all the repositories but won't show them in their > profile. (only for provenpackager group). Proven packagers will get all the > fun on moving to pagure. > > pingou is inclined to go with the first option and so am i. > > What do you think? Does anyone have a strong preference for > one or the other? > > Thanks, > Vivek there is also the secondary arch groups who have commit to all packages. provenpackager is actually excluded from some packages. I do not think option 1 is acceptable. We need some way to support allowing proven packages to review commits. we also need to ensure we do not break secondary arch work. Dennis _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
