Re: Docker Component in Bugzilla

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 17:28:43 -0400
Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:32:39AM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> > > Yeah, I think what we need is a "Fedora Docker" product.
> > > ie, at this level:
> > > Is "Fedora Docker" the right name for the product?  
> > I'm honestly not sure, I'd like to get mattdm and/or the Council to
> > chime in on that. I'm definitely not the right person for selecting
> > the color of the bike shed.  
> 
> I was first thinking "Fedora Docker Layered Images" — it's longish but
> accurately descriptive. But then I thought: actually, we don't have a
> clear bug-reporting home for _base_ images (other than pagure for the
> fedora-kickstarts). So, if it isn't too ugly to overload the namespace
> just a little bit, we could just do "Fedora Docker Images".
> 
> What do you all think?

Sure, works for me. 

kevin

Attachment: pgpxNxDdHxtkF.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux