On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 17:28:43 -0400 Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:32:39AM -0500, Adam Miller wrote: > > > Yeah, I think what we need is a "Fedora Docker" product. > > > ie, at this level: > > > Is "Fedora Docker" the right name for the product? > > I'm honestly not sure, I'd like to get mattdm and/or the Council to > > chime in on that. I'm definitely not the right person for selecting > > the color of the bike shed. > > I was first thinking "Fedora Docker Layered Images" — it's longish but > accurately descriptive. But then I thought: actually, we don't have a > clear bug-reporting home for _base_ images (other than pagure for the > fedora-kickstarts). So, if it isn't too ugly to overload the namespace > just a little bit, we could just do "Fedora Docker Images". > > What do you all think? Sure, works for me. kevin
Attachment:
pgpxNxDdHxtkF.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
