On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:32:39AM -0500, Adam Miller wrote: > > Yeah, I think what we need is a "Fedora Docker" product. > > ie, at this level: > > Is "Fedora Docker" the right name for the product? > I'm honestly not sure, I'd like to get mattdm and/or the Council to > chime in on that. I'm definitely not the right person for selecting > the color of the bike shed. I was first thinking "Fedora Docker Layered Images" — it's longish but accurately descriptive. But then I thought: actually, we don't have a clear bug-reporting home for _base_ images (other than pagure for the fedora-kickstarts). So, if it isn't too ugly to overload the namespace just a little bit, we could just do "Fedora Docker Images". What do you all think? -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
