Re: Freeze break request: API break request: FAS to not return inactive accounts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 13:19:46 +0000
Patrick Uiterwijk <puiterwijk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon
> <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 02:43:57PM +0000, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote:  
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Since we currently have to deal with a lot of spam accounts, it
> >> would be very useful for our
> >> systems, like zodbot and FMN, to not retrieve all of those
> >> accounts from FAS.
> >>
> >> I have just merged a patch for FAS2 to not return inactive
> >> accounts by default, and I would
> >> like +1s to push this to production.
> >>
> >> The patch is at https://github.com/fedora-infra/fas/pull/161.
> >>
> >> Do note that this patch does break the FAS2 API in that it suddenly
> >> stops returning inactive users.
> >> Please take this into consideration when sending a +1/-1.  
> >
> > Based on the discussion we had here, idea:
> >   What about inverting the change, keep the behavior the same
> > except and add a filter to restrict the user returned to a
> > specified status?
> >
> > So something like:
> >   https://admin.stg.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/list/a*?status=active
> >
> > This should keep the current behavior the same while allowing those
> > who want to restrict the list of users to do so.  
> 
> Sounds like a good option to me.
> I'll see about preparing the patch if everyone agrees with that.

I like that idea much better. ;) 

kevin

Attachment: pgpS4eR6Lddfp.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux