Proposal) Reply-To: On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 01:49:26PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > We have tried to avoid celery serveral times in the past and always > managed to, but perhaps we can't this time. Is there any alternative to > the celery use? Outside of the topic at hand, do you remember the reasons why we tried to avoid celery until now? Was this something specific to celery? Or AMQP in general? Or? Since I'm investigating changing the architecture of FMN's backend in such a way that it would use both redis and AMQP (rabbitmq to be precise), I'm curious if there is anything I should be aware of before going to far down this road :) Thanks, Pierre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
