Re: [PATCH] Refactor xinetd in a separate role

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:53:00 +0200
Michael Scherer <misc@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 08:57:14AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > So, we actually don't use xinetd for any of the git servers anymore
> > (those had conditionals for rhel6). We do use it for download
> > servers, but how about we just git rid of it and move those to the
> > systemd socket too?  
> 
> That's fine by me. Do we have a list somewhere with
> the os version of each services ? as I suspect there
> is a few stuff to clean around, it would help to do it.

You can get that from the host/group vars which should have the
kickstart and initial repo. Most things are rhel7, next most are fedora
23, last is a small rhel6 group. ;) 
>  
> > Unless there's something in the xinetd setup we cannot do in the
> > systemd setup?   
> 
> There is some connexion limitations setup on one of the 2 rsync
> groups. While systemd support max connexion, there is no limit per
> sources (unlike xinetd). At least on EL7, maybe things are different
> in a more recent version

hum, then I guess we might need it longer, but someone should
investigate.

kevin

Attachment: pgpBWatImPZlE.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux