On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:08:41 -0600 Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: +1 sounds reasonable and something that will be very useful to have sooner than later. Tim > Greetings. > > I'd like to take download05 out of dns and test out using cachefilesd > on it. We tried this a number of years ago with rhel6 and ran into > problems, but perhaps rhel7 might be more stable. > > Basically this would be setting up a 500GB cache on the server and > then caching 500GB of stuff from nfs. In theory this would reduce > load on the backend NFS server. There is a pending netapp upgrade and > storage folks would need to throttle our access while the upgrade was > happening, so the more load we can take off the filer, the better it > will be when we have to do the upgrade. > > I'd take download05 out of dns (so no one should hit it), setup > cachefilesd and test. If all goes well on testing we could re-add it > and see if handles normal load. If not or if it cannot handle regular > load we can just repave it and put it back the way it is now. > > 4 download machines should be fine for the normal load we have, and > this testing should long be done before the end of the week when we > might need to stage Alpha. > > Thoughts? +1s? > > kevin
Attachment:
pgplocTs5r0Q2.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
