This sounds reasonable.. so +1 On 21 March 2016 at 16:08, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Greetings. > > I'd like to take download05 out of dns and test out using cachefilesd > on it. We tried this a number of years ago with rhel6 and ran into > problems, but perhaps rhel7 might be more stable. > > Basically this would be setting up a 500GB cache on the server and then > caching 500GB of stuff from nfs. In theory this would reduce load on > the backend NFS server. There is a pending netapp upgrade and storage > folks would need to throttle our access while the upgrade was > happening, so the more load we can take off the filer, the better it > will be when we have to do the upgrade. > > I'd take download05 out of dns (so no one should hit it), setup > cachefilesd and test. If all goes well on testing we could re-add it > and see if handles normal load. If not or if it cannot handle regular > load we can just repave it and put it back the way it is now. > > 4 download machines should be fine for the normal load we have, and > this testing should long be done before the end of the week when we > might need to stage Alpha. > > Thoughts? +1s? > > kevin > > _______________________________________________ > infrastructure mailing list > infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > -- Stephen J Smoogen. _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
