On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 09:33:20AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > In recent fedpkg/rpkg versions (at least the ones in rawhide now) it's > incorrectly looking for a namespaced (rpms vs anything else) lookaside > instead of the non namespaced one we have. AFAIK we haven't pushed changes to fedpkg/rpkg related to the namespacing, so it might be something that changed in the repo making the old code behaving inconsistently. > So, this gives: > > % fedpkg -v srpm > Creating repo object from /home/kevin/git/pkgs/midori/master > Downloading midori_0.5.11_all_.tar.bz2 > Full url: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/pkgs/rpms/midori/midori_0.5.11_all_.tar.bz2/md5/fcc03ef759fce4fe9f2446d9da4a065e/midori_0.5.11_all_.tar.bz2 > ######################################################################## 100.0% > Could not execute srpm: Server returned status code 404 > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/fedpkg", line 16, in <module> > main() > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedpkg/__main__.py", line 69, in main > sys.exit(client.args.command()) > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyrpkg/cli.py", line 1234, in srpm > self.cmd.sources() > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyrpkg/__init__.py", line 1696, in sources > hashtype=entry.hashtype, branch=self.branch_merge) > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyrpkg/lookaside.py", line 174, in download > raise DownloadError('Server returned status code %d' % status) > pyrpkg.errors.DownloadError: Server returned status code 404 > > And on upload it puts it in a rpms dir thats not correct. What is the git remote URL for this repo? I suspect that's what fedpkg/rpkg are using and therefore the source of the problem. > So, I would like to do the following: > > * Move all the /srv/cache/lookaside/pkgs/rpms/ to > their /src/cache/lookaside/pkgs/ versions. > > * create a link from /srv/cache/lookaside/pkgs/rpms > to /srv/cache/lookaside/pkgs > > This should fix this issue until we push out a fedpkg/rpkg fix or want > to namespace lookaside. > > +1s? +1 for me, we should get the situation fixed anyway (+ if my intuition is correct we'll have a chicken-egg problem between this and the package with ++ in their names). Pierre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
