On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 05:14:07PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 23.11.2015 v 16:55 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 04:20:32PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> Sorry, but I'm not really sure it works as expected looking at: > >> > >> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ruby > >> > >> it says "ruby - subpackage of rubygems" which is definitely not true. > > So the data in mdapi seems correct: > > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/mdapi/rawhide/pkg/rubygems?pretty=True > > the basename is ruby, and rubygem is a sub-package of it. > > Well, it is probably a bit more complex, considering this: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=682005 > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=674190 > > I.e. there is rubygems-2.4.5-44.fc24.noarch.rpm subpackage of ruby > package and at the same time rubygems-2.4.8-100.fc24.noarch.rpm, which > is standalone rubygems package. So if the mdapi is supposed to return > information about the latest package, the it should return information > about the rubygems-2.4.8-100.fc24.noarch.rpm, since it has higher NVR. > > But that is probably different issue then the aforementioned one ;) Thanks Vít. This looks tricky. Can you file an issue about this at https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages ?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
