Re: mdapi in our infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 10:40:56 -0500
Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >>>>> "PC" == Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:  
> 
> PC> My problem is more for the package in Fedora also present in RHEL,
> PC> thus where we only want the python3 version as otherwise we
> PC> conflict.  
> 
> That's where either you don't build the python2 version on RHEL, by
> using a separate spec or with a mass of ifdefs.  I guess this hinges
> on whether having an _srpm_ with the same name as one in RHEL would
> cause an issue for EPEL, even if there's no conflict with the binary
> packages.  I would guess not as I haven't seen any mention of
> mass-reviews (or exemptions for such) for python3-* packages in EPEL.

koji operates on package names. It will only get rpms from a package in
one place, it won't mix them at all. 

So, if RHEL has python-foo and EPEL creates a package named python-foo,
it will cause koji to completely and utterly ignore the RHEL python-foo
and all rpms it makes. 

So, you will need to make python3-foo for python3 support in EPEL where
there's a python2 version in RHEL. 

kevin

Attachment: pgps0vWyLc8lp.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux