>>>>> "PC" == Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: PC> My problem is more for the package in Fedora also present in RHEL, PC> thus where we only want the python3 version as otherwise we PC> conflict. That's where either you don't build the python2 version on RHEL, by using a separate spec or with a mass of ifdefs. I guess this hinges on whether having an _srpm_ with the same name as one in RHEL would cause an issue for EPEL, even if there's no conflict with the binary packages. I would guess not as I haven't seen any mention of mass-reviews (or exemptions for such) for python3-* packages in EPEL. - J< _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
