-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/17/2015 05:01 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > All the work in the ansible repo should be covered under the FPCA, > so without any explicit license I would think it would be MIT. We > could see about getting a list of folks who worked on it and > getting them to put it under GPLv2+ if you like. Or we could just > stay with MIT? Any free license is fine. MIT is fine as well. Mirek -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVMSRLAAoJEODXORnxaDVAukUQAJfYWLHFfmovo/2j5E/JrQlh e63jCBKlClIreHtfDJIDYUvbVX4/eBr1tv9HkNIHpG0G/4hesUmauIIDlG/wLlRH im4qLZSLe2jK1+arQCLf2TeiFm7OCNZ6idb0+5Hn83OTySquVsUq9upARGJ6CZ5x 4iYLf8o7lDgAG8H30O10tOTa+njDNJ+iPU70t5xG2eUbhi6LYwkMFeNS1+go12YS Fr7dud7lwoMnf9vmDo7sxvUS3zziglAs/b6WmoYceiyCxOEEkGKlvS8l99qB8/eg sPhs2Si8NHp/fG4Rcj5HgXEi+t8b5xtIQb067LdeeG8ZxEE8emzh1QDNSglLBtcr 0yqRI9Y76LOWb30msXMYUWWNGrvAdCL4ON8027gbD53VOZw3HEhpk3TG2HEhLhyR lDWh/5Qrmx/PXBnt42U6UXQAo2CjUHnlie1L6ihlPLRgDcC9bEJKS/2GeJCm/ZHp QVopJWOlkCl0zbTM9KZWXI4oQaVUvIAq/KsTtjXeBu48fjjlbGuMqHS5Q1pw+C7v VmxXgBUhFnmtk+clLph6xG5V79T0Arf6+GV0Ow4GgUNYaYL2vjagzIhy6Pn0dYer 42hfTbquyUmzNCBvjuJzGFZdBbtgT/z/ZtALeQnNkH51ayqKwfWB2YmN4A+FhIJ6 7asVU8BKjeS3GJ6NGRsz =Ty9E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
