On Thu, 2 Apr 2015 19:29:34 +0200 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 12:23:29PM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > On 04/02/2015 12:17 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > >2207 packages fully retired > > > > That doesn't seem correct. My script is up to 2634 and counting. > > The API calls we were using before were above 3000. > > But these were returning packages that were Retired at least on one > branch. So for example: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/4ti2/ > was returned because it is retired on master, but it is still > maintained on EPE6 and EPEL7. > > That's why the previous script I had was incorrect. Also that brings up another point... since "Fedora EPEL" is it's own component, we could close for bugs anything that has all active fedora branches retired or all active epel branches retired. kevin
Attachment:
pgp8bHPU9wxy4.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
