-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 16 Nov 2014 19:09:25 -0600 Dennis Gilmore <dennis@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 13:31:42 -0500 > Cole Robinson <crobinso@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Fixing buildsys CC > > > > On 11/15/2014 01:29 PM, Cole Robinson wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > The ISO volume ID for the Fedora 21 workstation livecd is > > > 'Fedora-Live-Workstation-x86_64-2', which doesn't actually say 21 > > > in it, and libosinfo can't use it to detect the fedora version for > > > boxes/virt-manager. > > > > > > Koji is responsible for generating the volume ID, and there's a > > > bug filed: > > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145264 > > > > > > I also sent a (untested) koji patch to buildsys list: > > > > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/buildsys/2014-October/004411.html > > NAK on this patch its the completely wrong place to apply such a > thing. the fix belongs in livecd-tools of course though things need to be done differently in koji. because we would need to pass through the full untrunckated value or do something else that involves ignoring the CLI. But I do stand by koji being the wrong place for that knowledge. especially true if we change the naming scheme going forward. which is something we intend to do. keep them under 32 characters but make them a bit more readable. really libosinfo should be looking in the image and not relying on the filesystem volumeid to determine the release of an image. something outside of the contents could be manipulated, while it is much less likely to happen inside the image. Denni > > > However neither have received a response, so I'm reaching out > > > here. > > > > > > If this isn't fixed before F21 GA, we are stuck with the crappy > > > volume ID forever and tools that are depending on it are in a > > > tough spot. Is there any process to escalate this and get the fix > > > deployed to infrastructure? (FWIW I've just proposed the bug as a > > > freeze exception, but presumably it will take more coordination > > > that that) > > Dennis -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUaU6qAAoJEH7ltONmPFDRFTcP/3b1fbWwIkvrLMRfnwfDrfVG HvdiG8Jnk17mDD4GMcJBcdeXiRh1DPDlL2NUAcdrYIXCUpY9ObxCmDRgpqy8Q5mb KMoDXutfhM6qjyJfGrQ/lXuidL/13EwcnrRkTlJb/asD9MxjDbfE6WoDasUXGE+/ lvBiiieY8n+n2bgz4Z8xq3Y3p0nPoq0m+GOiw+LbwE/8gLm9hxjifx6BMaFpFmoJ RSo+HT02xa9X6yu4c2uE//0OsPRZDXc9v2wAjf0gUqPuoHHG3aAC9AhO2DN1Ef74 /eXQFA6FbmYIGLsvLrdh+IeEdtZw8I1gyIoR5OFC/BoNG/v9h+KUDi6Dk6+YqPU7 tRIDE1HMTyEF0vOqL6Rj8QcdrECYflxt4P9HtD65xPZ2zYj3Zg5tMzcIDI4HNrOG 2tkumr51COsL/zimKySL1ETARXY0wIjExEnfIT9zPb1Olww3E8PhYotszLjsuYJH F8vdFZhea/UYLZsREMcI+gc157WsGCGK6juhQqMa8DnEvXkjT7sVkjWzssj/4GE/ fS3tPPAuzLW/dcjP6fnIrJTpf/VoajcTeYqz7sH6AQmqo1taxOBxR+pQiwbrDHb6 gpbjs9CdcfTt8LHfYk8JObCa8wRec0xH7NpWVAGgS67qtuYzcMyZ3uBzTMbHgqg0 cL+JgMO8VWZG1VFxd1W7 =4ACh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
