On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 09:50:16AM +0100, Till Maas wrote: > On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 03:11:17PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > So, what I would like to ask is: > > * what do you think of the project? Worth pursuing or not? > > Even if it is only used by Fedora it is good to get away from the wiki > page. I always planned to add some more features that require a more > information per package, e.g. getting automatic changelog details for > new packages. I guess you're thinking of upstream's changelog from an eventual `CHANGELOG` file in the upstream sources? I've been thinking of cnucnu as the back-end library while cnucnu-web is just the interface, so if you like to add more feature, I'm all for it :) > > So if we agree to get it up and running, I foresee few steps: > > * Check with legal if there are any limitations (ie: can we put non-FOSS projects > > in there?) > > It is not only non-FOSS software but also about software with patents > that might be problematic. I have asked spot about this. Pierre _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
