-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/04/2013 04:03 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > On 4 December 2013 13:20, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx > <mailto:kevin@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > So, at todays fesco meeting there was some discussion about coprs. > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meetbot/fedora-meeting/2013-12-04/fesco.2013-12-04-17.59.log.html#l-52 > > > > And then you run into the politics of who gets shipped and who > doesn't and if you don't ship all of them then how do you add new > ones that get added and ones that go away.. Too much cart, too > little horse. > As discussed at the FESCo meeting, this should be entirely up to FESCo. My proposal would be that COPR repository owners would petition FESCo (via a ticket), it would get voted on or we'd come back and tell them what changes they'd need to make before it would be accepted (e.g. "Please don't downgrade glibc", etc.) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlKgdawACgkQeiVVYja6o6OygQCfZCxV7xfrDzU/4A4ku1YdeqQ8 3BUAnjUV0v7ZOo+VSJvujmf3q7nwbqUo =X9Tu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
