On Tue, 1 Oct 2013 17:00:11 -0500 Ian Weller <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 12:06:23PM -0500, Ian Weller wrote: > > We checked into it on IRC a few days ago and there's not a boolean > > available to handle this, so how do we handle SELinux policies in > > puppet or ansible? (And do we want to submit this upstream?) > > Never mind, this is now working (custom SELinux module in puppet). > > > (I need to split out the web application and the job runner in > > puppet still, but that should get done within the next couple of > > hours.) > > This is done as well. > > Additionally, it looks like fedmsg 0.7.0 has been spread across all of > staging (I believe Ralph did this when he released it), so I think > we're ready to go with updating fedmsg/datanommer/datagrepper in > production. With the updates today I think we should be on 0.7.0 accross the board. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
