Re: datanommer/datagrepper upgrade status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 12:06:23PM -0500, Ian Weller wrote:
> We checked into it on IRC a few days ago and there's not a boolean
> available to handle this, so how do we handle SELinux policies in puppet
> or ansible? (And do we want to submit this upstream?)

Never mind, this is now working (custom SELinux module in puppet).

> (I need to split out the web application and the job runner in puppet
> still, but that should get done within the next couple of hours.)

This is done as well.

Additionally, it looks like fedmsg 0.7.0 has been spread across all of
staging (I believe Ralph did this when he released it), so I think we're
ready to go with updating fedmsg/datanommer/datagrepper in production.

-- 
Ian Weller <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Attachment: pgpvfPznf4BPM.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux