On 09/18/2013 10:41 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Emmanuel Seyman <emmanuel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
* "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" [18/09/2013 21:40] :
Clarify why
ug
* no dependencies/blocks
* no flags
* markdown parsing makes it easy to privilege noise over signal
* no shared bug lists
* no dashboard
* status and resolution are conflated
* no way to move bugs from one package to another
* no sane way to migrate bugs from other trackers
* no way to CC individual bugs without adding a comment
* much more limited e-mail options in general
Also, if the reason we're switching bug trackers is the belief that the
maintainers of it aren't being responsive to Fedora's needs, it makes zero sense
to switch to something whose maintainers couldn't care less about us at all.
(We're definitely not their target market.)
Well there have been several voices within our community wanting us to
report directly upstream as opposed to be using bugzilla in the first
place and at the same time the project is dire need for more
contributors so to me the solution to both these problem is to find a
way to bring the community closer to upstream as opposed to us trying to
convince upstream come to down to us ( Which we have been trying for
years in competition with other distro's )
JBG
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
