On 11 July 2013 17:16, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11 July 2013 16:45, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
yeah, something is still not right, but not sure what it is.
We did upgrade mirrormanager, perhaps the new one doesn't log those
redirects the same way? ;(
kevin
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
In order to get an idea of what might be wrong I am doing the following per month:
for i in $( seq -w 1 30 ); do echo $i; bzcat proxy0*/2013/06/$i/http/download.fedoraproject.org-access.log* | egrep "Fedora-.*\.iso" | grep 302 | awk '{n=split($7,a,"/"); print $1" "a[n]}' | sort -u | awk '{print $2}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -bnr| head -n 20 > ~/iso-downloads/top20-06-$i; doneI will do it for each month this year and that should give us a record of what the top 20 downloads of isos were per day. Then if we see a large drop after mirrormanager was upgraded we know the script changed something. Will know in a couple of hours.
I did the checks and I didn't see a large drop in iso downloads after mirrormanager was put into place. I can put the numbers in a csv in a short while.
--Stephen J Smoogen.
Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
