On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 17:12:23 -0400
"Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The direct download numbers I'm gathering via script for F19 seem way
> off. So much so that I think I must be missing a good bit of data.
>
> The script I'm using is attached. Can someone help me understand
> where I might be missing relevant data? Looking through the entire
> hosts log structure is kind of daunting but I'm thinking there might
> have been some well-known change that moved a chunk of log data to a
> place I'm not looking through.
For one thing the logs are now bz2'ed...
ie:
/var/log/hosts/proxy09.vpn.fedoraproject.org/2013/07/09/http/download.fedoraproject.org-access.log.bz2
[kevin@log02 ~]$ egrep
"Fedora-19.*\.iso" /var/log/hosts/proxy09.vpn.fedoraproject.org/2013/07/09/http/download.fedoraproject.org-access.log.bz2
| wc -l 0
[kevin@log02 ~]$ bzgrep
"Fedora-19.*\.iso" /var/log/hosts/proxy09.vpn.fedoraproject.org/2013/07/09/http/download.fedoraproject.org-access.log.bz2
| wc -l 1478
Patch:
15,16c15,16
< egrep "Fedora-$RELEASE.*\.iso" \
< /var/log/hosts/proxy*/${YEAR}/${MONTH}/${DAY}/http/download.fedoraproject.org-access.log
| \ ---
> bzgrep "Fedora-$RELEASE.*\.iso" \
> /var/log/hosts/proxy*/${YEAR}/${MONTH}/${DAY}/http/download.fedoraproject.org-access.log.bz2
> | \
I have no idea if those numbers look better or not tho, there might be
something more going on.
kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
