Re: nagios and ansible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:35:21 -0400
seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I've been thinking about how we should handle nagios in the ansible
> world.
> 
> our current nagios config in puppet has a number of issues:
> 1. it's a bit cumbersome b/c you edit nagios independent of adding the
> host's config
> 2. when you remove a host the nagios config doesn't automatically go
> away
> 3. the fqdn/vpn hostname thing between noc01 and noc02 is kinda a
> giant pain in the ass

I think this actually should be fixed now?
Or am I misremembering fixing it? (possible)

> 4. dependencies between Networks->vhosts->guests are manual and
> irritating to maintain.

Agreed on the rest for sure. 
 
> I'm open to suggestions about how to maintain all of this. Here are
> some ideas I've tinkered with:
> 
> 
> a. we stop putting nagios configs in the specific config mgmt entirely
> -and put it in another repo - like with dns. That doesn't make 1 or 2
> any better - but it could allow us to script to make 3 and 4 much
> better
>
> b. we make populating nagios configs for hosts or services be a
> function of playbooking the host/group creation. So all of the nagios
> configs go on when you add the host. - tht doesn't solve 2 or 4 but
> maybe it does handle 1 and 3 a bit.

I like this idea, I think it does solve 4 a tad... as you would know
what virthost and datacenter, etc from the ansible vars. 
 
> c. we make the nagios configs generate from the host inventory data
> that ansible can retrieve. It will require us to define a series of
> additional variables per host or per group. So when you add a new host
> you'll need to wait for a cron run or an ansible run against our
> nagios hosts to get them to see the new hosts. With enough effort I
> think we can tag all of 1, 2, 3 and 4 in creating THE whole set of
> nagios configs that way and rsyncing them over using the
> ansible-rsync module (or just rsync). 
>   The problem with this one is that it seems like an all-or-nothing
>   scenario - we need to drive ALL of our nagios configs off of this or
>   none at all. With that in mind it seems like we would need to define
>   hosts as part of ansible even if they are still being managed by
>   puppet. That's extra work but I think it is work we'd have to do
>   eventually.

Yeah, we could also fire up a new noc03/04 to test with... leave the
existing stuff around and test with this until the new one was 'good
enough'. 
 
>  So (c) would be something like this:
>   - take the list of hosts - look for a vmhost or if it is a cloud
>     instance - make that a dep

What about non linux stuff? management interfaces and tape drives and
such? I guess we need some extra task sugar that adds those in? we
would need some kind of inventory for them thats not real inventory
(since ansible wouldn't work against them). 

>   - look for a datacenter - make that a dep
>   - look for a vpn cert - make that a dep
>   - and on up the chain.
>   - look for any special service definitions that we'd be managing
>     manually

I guess we could just define these as a var per host/group that has the
special checks?

>   - put all of the hosts definitions in one big file so changing out
>     that file can be idempotent
>   - put service definitions in individual files - but have the files
>     rsynced over with --delete so removing one gets removed on the
>     nagios side, too

Yep. Seems reasonable. 

Also, how about pushing the new config (when we do) and running 'nagios
-v /etc/nagios/nagios.cfg' and if it fails, punt back and restore the
old data and error. (we would have to save the old content, but that
shouldn't be too hard). 

I am Liking c more and more. ;) 

> Anyone have an option D we should think about? I'd like to hear about
> more

Well, we could always look around at !nagios again, but it's always
depressing. ;) The one suggested downthread we could look at, but ruby
will be a hard sell here. 

I think any that wouldn't be configurable via ansble are no go really.
Since we don't want to have to use some web interface or other manual
junk to add hosts. 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux