On 06/17/2013 03:27 PM, Ralph Bean wrote: > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:47:44PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> Yeah, I could see github's flow being nice here for proposing new >> badges, etc... but somehow it feels strange to me to directly depend on >> them in this way. > > Ricky E had some good points in channel which I'll re-post here for > posterity: > > re: using github for badges, I think it'd be neat if we could get to that > point (but like nirik said, probably something to talk about after the > freeze). I'm wondering if we couldn't either 1) Just have a cron pull > the badges files from github every few hours, or 2) Set up a tiny POST hook > listener from github and pull based on that. > > In either of those cases, we have a local copy of the repo, since we're just > pulling from github > > if github goes down, we still have a copy of it for use in infra. > >> So, I guess I'd say lets do a lockbox01 repo for now, and reevaluate >> after freeze is over? > > Agreed. I've setup a lockbox01 repo for now. > > > > _______________________________________________ > infrastructure mailing list > infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure > My input is that if we make use of GitHub, there should be another means of contributing that is at least as effective. I don't like the idea of basing a Fedora structure on GitHub's structure. -- oddshocks
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
