On Fri, 10 May 2013 11:15:56 -0700 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 02:17:35PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > So, the recent fas vulnerability made us realize that we were not > > collecting and saving httpd logs from staging machines. > > > > I've since added: > > > > app01.stg > > app02.stg > > proxy01.stg > > > Did you leave out fas01.stg on purpose? Nope. Forgot it. ;) > > to have their httpd logs pulled over to log02 and kept. > > > > This however got me thinking. Since we are moving to a model where > > each app has it's own server, should we widen the servers we pull > > httpd logs from? For example, ask01/02? fedocal? blockerbugs? > > > I think so. If we're looking to analyze logs for tracebacks, errors, > etc, then having consolidated logging makes it much easier than > logging into our redundant servers for that service. Right. ok. Would someone like to look at adding those other servers? Otherwise I will do it monday. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
