On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 02:17:35PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > So, the recent fas vulnerability made us realize that we were not > collecting and saving httpd logs from staging machines. > > I've since added: > > app01.stg > app02.stg > proxy01.stg > Did you leave out fas01.stg on purpose? > to have their httpd logs pulled over to log02 and kept. > > This however got me thinking. Since we are moving to a model where each > app has it's own server, should we widen the servers we pull httpd logs > from? For example, ask01/02? fedocal? blockerbugs? > I think so. If we're looking to analyze logs for tracebacks, errors, etc, then having consolidated logging makes it much easier than logging into our redundant servers for that service. > Or should we figure out a better way to collect and store the httpd > logs. > > Thoughts? > I don't think we have any ideas for how to do something better immediately... So we probably should just add all the other hosts for now. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgprTK4ijwHFU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
