Inform GitLab devs about the current situation (was: Interested in Gitlab for Fedora Hosted Projects | GSoC 2013)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/12/2013 05:20 PM, Ranjib Dey wrote:
I share the same concerns. We had similar experience with gitorious too.
And we ended up maintaining our forks. Gitlab shares even more features
with github than gitorious. I suspect its going to be a high
maintainance deployment.

Also withe current trend in rubygem packaging its becoming increasingly
difficult to maintain shared pool of rubygems across apps. One pattern
many app followed is to create omnibus installer (sensu, chef et al)
which bundles everything above glibc. But i wont recomnend that for fedora.

On Apr 12, 2013 6:35 AM, "seth vidal" <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:47:21 +0200
    Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

     > Hi Ankur,
     >
     > Since GitLab is Ruby on Rails application and the first step is to
     > package it and all its dependencies for Fedora, I recommend you to
     > join the Ruby-SIG ML, where is already ongoing discussion about it.
     >

    Seems to me the first step is to see if maintaining it and deploying it
    is actually what we want - which it is not at all clear it is anymore.

    Upstream gitlab devel is pretty negative on public browseability of the
    trees. They won't even accept patches to do it. Also - if you read
    their tickets there seems to be some other issue with that.

    Finally, I am concerned that gitlab looking similar to github is a
    liability. Due to the visual similarity many folks will be expecting
    some kind of feature parity and it is safe to say that gitlab is very,
    very far from that and they don't even seem interested in pursuing it.

    That's concerning.

    -sv
    _______________________________________________

Sorry for hijacking Ankur's thread, but since the deadline of the gsoc application is approaching we need to know if this project stands as valid. I crafted a draft post [0] to send to gitlab's group. Please review it and let me know.

PS. There is a fork [1] which supports public browserability. I just mention it, I don't think we should use patched forks whatsoever.

[0] http://axilleas.github.io/static/files/gsoc13-gitlab-proposal.txt
[1] https://github.com/ArthurHoaro/Public-GitLab

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux