On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 04:44:39 +0200 Axilleas Pipinellis <axilleas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Greetings from a newly registered member! > > I've seen the 'GSoC @ Infra' thread but I didn't want to hijack it > nor do I know how to reply to a thread through mailman... > > I will be applying for GSoC this summer and GitLab is my first > priority as I have been using it since version 2 and I want to > contribute in any way I can. I have been talking with Vit Ondruch > about the packaging procedure and I just sent a mail [0] to the > ruby-sig list too, regarding this. Excellent. ;) > I have also read last year's discussion [1] and it was made clear by > Dan Allen [2] that besides the whole implementation thing, it is as > important to find some people that will maintain the project > longterm. And I am willing to do this. I don't know if it is possible > for more than one person to work on a project during GSoC, but > another fellow is interested in this as well [3]. So, now we are > two :p > > This should be very interesting and I am looking forward to hearing > from the infra team :) Sure. We have talked about this as well... I think the important thing to focus on right now is the packaging. Until it's packaged and up to Fedora guidelines, we aren't likely to look at deploying it. :) Once the packaging hurdle is overcome, yeah, we would want a team to help manage it and deploy it and keep it running. Do see: http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/infra/docs/requestforresources.txt and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Request_For_Resources For our process on adding a new stupported application. It's kind of lengthy, but we want to make sure things are supportable and maintainable. Good luck and keep us posted on the packaging process. ;) kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
