On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 09:49:52 -0500 (EST) Seth Vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 14 Nov 2012, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 09:31:44AM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: > >>> But we do for releases, from which all previous release images > >>> have been spun, AFAIK. The cloud SIG made sure of that quite > >>> early on in its lifetime to keep everything GPL-compliant, and it > >>> might be worth keeping in mind as we consider how to build images > >>> for future releases. > >> and I a pretty sure for releases we're talking about something > >> else. This is for continual/nightly image generation, unless I'm > >> mistaken. > > > > I was thinking we'd generate the releases in the same way, but am > > willing to be disabused of that notion. > > > > Same software for image generation, certainly. Not obvious to me that > generating them in the same place is worthwhile. As long as the env is similar enough I don't know that it matters. Ideally it would be very similar tho, as you don't want your perfectly working and nice nightly images to fail to work when "officially" composed. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
