On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 05:09:15PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > It could be tweaked more for sure, but it seems to work and is > reasonably zippy. > Sounds like a winner then ;-) > Can anyone think of any reason not to just enable this on > hosted03/pkgs01? It can live alongside gitweb-caching and we can look > at redirects to take over when we want to retire gitweb-caching. > Do we end up chewing "twice" the resources that way? If gitweb-caching is already causing us load issues sometimes... seems like we're just adding more buren to the machines. OTOH, if it lets us get gitweb-caching off sooner to have cgit stood up on the hosts ASAP, then +1 :-) > Some things to look at before announcing/making live/retiring > gitweb-caching: > > - Do we want to ask the design/websites folks for a custom css thats > more "fedora-ey" ? > > - How much do we want to try and set redirects to replace > gitweb-caching? > I wouldn't block on either of these. I think that the css could be done after the fact. redirects I think we've determined are nice to have but if links in mailing list archives break, we're prepared to accept that. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpHFk2PzHeYp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
