hi, Sorry replying after closing the ticket, I was traveling Japan last two weeks and had no internet connection. Now I like you all involved to reconsider this RFR. As Jared pointed, it was clearly agreed to revisit. This offer is great opportunity for all translators to test new tool which has potential to be hosted at Fedora ground. And as Mike said, the conversation should start with translators, so that we will be able to come back. It is best to have a test instance within fp.o. Please notice that this RFR is just asking a test, not a move. As someone refer to the need or the cost (people power or $$), without testing, translators will not be able to evaluate those whether it is worth or not. I like you all to remind that it is not zero cost but it does cost running transifex for Fedora at tx.net as well, manpower of Infidex. I have been strong supporter of Transifex, and still am confident that Transifex is excellent tool for translators in some projects. However there is no reason to deny other tools because it was just developed/introduced after Transifex. Most of translators even do not notice this discussion. I beg you, please give us a chance and let us discuss ourselves before making any decision somewhere we do not know. Please do not squash the opportunity for us. noriko Ruediger Landmann さんは書きました: > Thanks all for the feedback and comments; some of it has been extremely > useful. > > I concur that it's premature to tie up Fedora resources in such a test; > I'll investigate other hosting avenues and reopen the discussion here > only if Zanata looks promising and after I have some buy-in from L10N. > > Cheers > Rudi > > _______________________________________________ > infrastructure mailing list > infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
