On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 20:57, Jayson Rowe <rowe.jayson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> In the end, this was not a foregone conclusion. I laid out what was >> needed to get this going again. >> 1) No last minute heroics. >> 2) More than 1 person running it, conversant in it, etc. >> 3) A laid out plan of what was going to be the sucessor, who was going >> to support it, how they were going to train others, etc >> >> This was said on multiple lists about 6 months ago in order to avoid a >> last minute "Ooooh Fedora screws contributors again." emails and week >> long heroics to keep it up again. If you and/or others have a problem >> with my decision from then, y'all have had multiple months to work on >> 2 and 3 because 1 is non-optional. > > I didn't mean to start anything - just offered to help if I could :-) > > I *will* try to attend the IRC meeting tomorrow at Kevin's invitiation! > Ugh. I thought I had put that in my reread and send tomorrow pile versus the "SEND" button. My deepest apologies because emails like mine can be a big turnoff for someone volunteering. My sentence comes across as blaming you and I take responsibility for being a general "ass" when I should not have been. I hope we can meet online or at the meeting and I can try to make up for this. -- Stephen J Smoogen. "The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance." Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University. "Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle." -- Ian MacLaren _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
