On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:57:06 -0500 inode0 <inode0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I can admit that in this case there are other organizations that > mostly share Fedora values that are available to use but on the other > hand there is a reason that almost half of the Fedora syndicated blogs > are currently hosted by Fedora infrastructure. That number I am sure > would continue to grow over time to an even higher percentage and is > currently biased in a low direction by the existence of many bloggers > who already had things in place prior to the existence of blogs.fp.o. > > Why would a Fedora contributor prefer to choose blogs.fp.o? ...snip... Yeah, I don't mean to say it has 0 value. There are still the things you indicate that are advantages. > Sorry to vent a little about this here but I really think blogs.fp.o > has more value than it is being given credit for and I'm sad to see it > being retired. (And I accept that even if it was given the credit I > think it deserves the decision to retire it would probably not > change.) Yeah. Some things that might help some here: * Make out openid support better/really good. That way you _can_ use your fedora id when commenting or posting in any place that supports openid. * I see someone has made a fedora wp theme, that could help people hosting elsewhere get some of the look and feel they may want. Thanks for the post... kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
