On Fri, 20 May 2011 17:09:54 -0500 Dennis Gilmore <dennis@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Friday, May 20, 2011 05:07:32 PM Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > On Friday, May 20, 2011 04:36:40 PM Matt_Domsch@xxxxxxxx wrote: > > > This is the first release we're doing since moving the master > > > mirrors from Red Hat I/T control to our control. > > > > > > With that, we dropped all the historical mirrors that were using > > > download.fedora.redhat.com and were in its rsync ACLs, forcing > > > people to use the tiering. > > > > > > Right now, we have only a few mirrors reporting having the > > > content (per the mirrorlists): > > > http://mirror.pnl.gov/fedora/linux/releases/15/Fedora/ > > > http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/releases/15/Fedora/ > > > ftp://mirror.cs.princeton.edu/pub/mirrors/fedora/linux/releases/15/Fedora / > > > http://mirror.seas.harvard.edu/fedora/linux/releases/15/Fedora/ > > > http://mirror.web-ster.com/fedora/releases/15/Fedora/ > > > http://mirror.hiwaay.net/pub/fedora/linux/releases/15/Fedora/ > > > http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/15/Fedora/ > > > > > > Should we consider: > > > a) force mirrors to change to tiering if they want the bits > > > before Day 0. b) opening up the restrictions on dl.fp.o so the > > > historical mirrors don't have to make changes (at a cost of > > > bandwidth from dl*) c) bitflipping really early (e.g. ~now) > We dont need to bitflip, we can just make it so its available via > rsync but not via http or ftp True. Looks like we are now up to 19 mirrors... so it's going up. Is that normal for this time before release? I'm not sure. How many do we normally like to have by release day? Matt? kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
