On Friday, May 20, 2011 05:07:32 PM Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Friday, May 20, 2011 04:36:40 PM Matt_Domsch@xxxxxxxx wrote: > > This is the first release we're doing since moving the master mirrors > > from Red Hat I/T control to our control. > > > > With that, we dropped all the historical mirrors that were using > > download.fedora.redhat.com and were in its rsync ACLs, forcing people to > > use the tiering. > > > > Right now, we have only a few mirrors reporting having the content (per > > the mirrorlists): http://mirror.pnl.gov/fedora/linux/releases/15/Fedora/ > > http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/releases/15/Fedora/ > > ftp://mirror.cs.princeton.edu/pub/mirrors/fedora/linux/releases/15/Fedora > > / http://mirror.seas.harvard.edu/fedora/linux/releases/15/Fedora/ > > http://mirror.web-ster.com/fedora/releases/15/Fedora/ > > http://mirror.hiwaay.net/pub/fedora/linux/releases/15/Fedora/ > > http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/15/Fedora/ > > > > Should we consider: > > a) force mirrors to change to tiering if they want the bits before Day 0. > > b) opening up the restrictions on dl.fp.o so the historical mirrors don't > > have to make changes (at a cost of bandwidth from dl*) c) bitflipping > > really early (e.g. ~now) We dont need to bitflip, we can just make it so its available via rsync but not via http or ftp > > d) stop using bitflipping entirely > > > > ? > > > > Thoughts? > > This should have gone to the releng list, i guess people dont pay > attention to things during Beta and Alpha since it was all setup this way > there. > > I think i had 1 or 2 people ask questions for Alpha and Beta, and i just > added them to the acl list. > > Dennis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
