On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 11:28 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 11:22 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: > > As a general code cleanup. Forking 3 shells to ruby to get data > > provided by puppet directly is less efficient and uglier than using a > > standard template. Also, while I don't imagine it will change anytime > > soon, but if the puppet code gets reorganized in the future, I can see > > the current ruby shell queries being broken more easily than accessing > > the variables via puppet. > > That's a fair explanation. > > Doing it b/c the puppet folks are more likely to break a relative > edge-case is reasonable. > > doing it b/c it is more puppet-y just irks me. > okay - I've found a usecase for this, now. bxen04 was renamed from another name - the make-minion-conf never got reran so func was just not working.. If it was a thing in puppet it would have been working. so... seems like your recommendation is a good one. thanks, -sv _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
