On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 11:22 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: > As a general code cleanup. Forking 3 shells to ruby to get data > provided by puppet directly is less efficient and uglier than using a > standard template. Also, while I don't imagine it will change anytime > soon, but if the puppet code gets reorganized in the future, I can see > the current ruby shell queries being broken more easily than accessing > the variables via puppet. That's a fair explanation. Doing it b/c the puppet folks are more likely to break a relative edge-case is reasonable. doing it b/c it is more puppet-y just irks me. :) > But it's not a big deal if you think it's not worth the risk to clean > it up. test it. people1 is easy to get into if it breaks. > (I've been called a pedant before though. Shocking, I know. ;) I've been called a fuddy-duddy, too. I'm not so keen on custom-languages for things like config-mgmt systems - but that's been my complaint about puppet from day one so... -sv _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
