On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Tristan Santore wrote: > On 04/03/10 16:54, Mike McGrath wrote: > > So I'm just going to throw this out there. Anyone else think zabbix isn't > > quite working out? > > > > I ask because it seems like > > > > A) we've been using zabbix for over a year and still haven't turned nagios > > off. > > > > B) Even after using it this whole time, I often run into issues adding new > > monitoring. > > > > Am I alone in this? Anyone out there super happy with our zabbix install? > > I love the results we get from it, but it feels like it's turning into a > > maintenance nightmare. > > > > -Mike > > _______________________________________________ > > infrastructure mailing list > > infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure > > > Something else to keep in mind is, that nagios already has providers and > types in puppet. > Another monitoring solution would need extra work, to puppetize it. > We never used the puppet types for nagios anyway. -Mike _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
