On 04/03/10 16:54, Mike McGrath wrote: > So I'm just going to throw this out there. Anyone else think zabbix isn't > quite working out? > > I ask because it seems like > > A) we've been using zabbix for over a year and still haven't turned nagios > off. > > B) Even after using it this whole time, I often run into issues adding new > monitoring. > > Am I alone in this? Anyone out there super happy with our zabbix install? > I love the results we get from it, but it feels like it's turning into a > maintenance nightmare. > > -Mike > _______________________________________________ > infrastructure mailing list > infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure > Something else to keep in mind is, that nagios already has providers and types in puppet. Another monitoring solution would need extra work, to puppetize it. Regards, Tristan -- Tristan Santore BSc MBCS TS4523-RIPE Network and Infrastructure Operations InterNexusConnect Mobile +44-78-55069812 Tristan.Santore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Former Thawte Notary (Please note: Thawte has closed its WoT programme down, and I am therefor no longer able to accredit trust) For Fedora related issues, please email me at: TSantore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
