On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 02:34:01PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > Were these the requirements we came up with? There's two options here: > > 1) Require only CLA > > 2) Require CLA + one group. > > We generally like 2) because that's also our definition of an actual > Fedora 'contributor' (it's also the list of users on fedorapeople) CLA + 1 group would be recommendation too. Same requirements as getting your blog posted on planet.fp.o (due to the fedorapeople requirement). FWIW, you have to be an Ubuntu member to get your blog aggregated on their planet. I didn't push too hard, but back when I was doing a bunch of packaging work with them, I didn't qualify for membership status. I like that Fedora has a lower threshhold to qualify, but keep it at CLA+1 to avoid pure spammers. -Matt -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
