Paul, Cheers to that, I miss read the site portion as if it were asking about any potential concerns there. If you need any help in developing/implementation of the additional services please feel free to let me know. I am not always around in IRC but would be more than willing to give a hand as needed, just shoot a project / idea in my direction. Just a side note I will be out of service for a few days from the 5th to the 7th. Heading down to cPanel Con. On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 15:09 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 01:20:02PM -0500, timg@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Generally from my experience the primary things that effect VoIP would > > be Packet loss, and Latency. There are tons of other things such as RF > > noise etc.. however those shouldnt* be an issue. > > > > Packet loss is going to be pretty obvious across the "wire" due to the > > way it is normally handled (fill in dropped packet with previous packets > > data). > > > > With that said depending on the wireless (signal strength / noise) there > > could be potential issues (packet loss, distortion, static, delay in > > sound), however if there are this can be easily mitigated by the use of > > the hard line. Just my 2 cents. - Tim > > This is good information to know, thanks Tim. Fortunately most of > what we're doing isn't going to be dependent on the quality of the > connection, but rather building additional functionality into the > services themselves. Your well-stated concerns above will continue to > apply across the board when using Fedora Talk or other VoIP systems. > _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list