Re: CVS1 and selinux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Darren VanBuren wrote:

> Last I heard, most of our machines had SELinux set to permissive. Was I
> misinformed?
>

Depends on when you were told that :)  We've been slowly working towards
an enforcing environment over the last year and a half or so.  I called
cvs1 out in particular because some of our processes on that host aren't
run very often and it's difficult for users of the host to realize what's
going on.  Figured it best to make our admins aware since it would
probably be non-obvious to them as well.

	-Mike

> Darren VanBuren
> -------------------------
> Sent from my iPod
>
> Try Fedora 10 today. Fire it up. http://fedoraproject.org/
> (I need a new slogan for Fedora 11 from marketing)
>
> On Sep 21, 2009, at 6:49, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Selinux on cvs1 is now in enforcing mode.  Please keep an eye out for any
> > oddities or broken services and let us know.
> >
> >   -Mike
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
> > Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
> Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux