On Jul 16, 2009, at 21:24, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 07/16/2009 08:50 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 19:59 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
What's the consensus here?
If we install patch, will git come next, since people will want to
git
am stuff? Not that I'm against having patch, it would make things
easier.
Well I won't be adding that one :-)
Thinking about this more seriously, patch can be useful on text
files on
any system. git is only useful on systems where we're making git
checkouts. git-am, if I'm reading the man page right would only be
useful where we have git checkouts and are receiving patches via mail?
Git am works on any file generated with git format-patch. That is most
often used with email but it does encapsulate the author and the
commit message and has a checksum itself that can be verified against
the upstream repo. Probably not something we need in global.
--
Jes
_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
