On 07/16/2009 08:50 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 19:59 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> What's the consensus here? > > If we install patch, will git come next, since people will want to git > am stuff? Not that I'm against having patch, it would make things > easier. Well I won't be adding that one :-) Thinking about this more seriously, patch can be useful on text files on any system. git is only useful on systems where we're making git checkouts. git-am, if I'm reading the man page right would only be useful where we have git checkouts and are receiving patches via mail? -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
