2009/3/1 Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx>: > What are your concerns about ogo stagnation? Does sogo have more > momentum or is it just a new fork? > I see the following potential things which lead me to believe that OGo is stagnated or close to it: September of 2007 appears to be the last time the website was updated for OGo. The -users list had 36 messages in February, 16 in January, none in December and 8 in November. Moreover of the two projects OGo is far more complex. Latest packages for the Fedora/RHEL world include FC[1-3], RH9 and RHEL3. Contrast that with Scalable OGo The users mailing list had 123 messages in February and 85 in January. (and I didn't look further) Website last updated 2009-01-30 Packages exist for RHEL5 Scalable OGo was really a project that Skyrix (the company behind OGo) took on as project work for a customer and eventually released as open source. So yes it's technically a fork, but not in the bad sense of the word. Moreover the fact that SOGo doesn't have the public file storage and document management system aspect which means it's less complex for us. Regardless it does seem to have more momentum. That said I merely toss that out there for consideration. Others are doing the work, and I don't want to bikeshed this, so feel free to ignore me. _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
