On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, David Nalley wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 1:50 PM, susmit shannigrahi
> <thinklinux.ssh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 2009/2/28 Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> >> On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, TJ Davis wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks, I have applied for sysadmin-test.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Right now susmit has lead on this but I'm not sure what his time
> >> constraints are over the next couple of weeks. If he's busy I'll just
> >> make sure you guys all have access and can hammer away at it a couple of
> >> hours at a time.
> >
> > No, I can commit time right now.
> > I was away a couple of days, I read up the documentations.
> > If I get a couple of more people, it will be nice. :)
> >
>
> So I'll note that when looking at this recently I see that
> Skyrix/Inverse released Scalable OGo (It was a custom solution at one
> point which was OGo without the document management system/crm-like
> components.) I've managed a few hundred user instance of OGo, but SOGo
> was made to handle tens of thousands of users, and it looks a bit
> simpler. I also fear that OGo is approaching stagnation, it could just
> be that it has reached maturity and changes aren't that big of a
> deal.. While the changelog rss feed showed 5 or so commits, it looks
> like a lot of the other things are slow - nothing more recent than FC3
> instructions or packages. Apparently back in the RHEL3 time frame
> Harald Hoyer was maintaining some RPM packages, but the spec
> files/srpms seem to have disappeared.
>
> Take a look at scalable ogo:
> http://scalableogo.org
>
What are your concerns about ogo stagnation? Does sogo have more
momentum or is it just a new fork?
-Mike_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
