Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:13:32PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 09:07:16PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Wouldn't it be useful to invite more than person as part of the
different groups? Currently it seems a number of people have not
attended which leaves that group voice unheard.
I'm pretty sure the meeting was public.
Was the invitation public?
I don't know. It doesn't really matter though. See the part of my email
that you cut off in your reply.
I think it does matter. If new meetings for Fedora is being organized,
invitations MUST be send publicly. I would want to know who is
organizing it, where it was held, which date and time, whether others
are attending etc. If it is a IRC meeting, where are the logs? You said
you are sure the meeting was public. Why do you think that?
I was wrong in thinking it was public. It was a phone call, not an IRC
meeting. Still does not matter, and you still apparently haven't read the
second part of my original reply.
I have. My point still stands. If a new Fedora meeting is being held, it
should not planned and organized as a secret. It should be announced
ahead of time in public so interested people can participate. Even if
you don't want others to participate, you can still organize it
publicly. The fact that the people someone decided to pick on their own
in private, can pull in others doesn't change this.
Rahul
_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
