On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 12:53 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > I was wrong in thinking it was public. It was a phone call, not an IRC > meeting. Just for more fun and confusion, a meeting doesn't have to be on IRC for it to be "public". While this meeting wasn't announced on one of the major lists (for good reason), it was somewhat assumed that if a leader for a group couldn't make it that they would have somebody else go in their steed. Perhaps we'll call that out a bit more clearly next time. These people were sent mail multiple times leading up to the meeting so there was plenty of chance to find an alternative. The release readiness meetings are designed to be very high bandwith information exchanges between the various groups involved with doing releases. Obviously the later releases (preview, final) are more important and have more people involved than the earlier (alpha, beta) ones. It's an exchange of information that each group should already have through through and discussed in lower bandwith higher visibility meetings within each group. The readiness meeting is just like a mini mission control meeting to ensure things go off without a hitch and that those leading the groups and responsible for the functions are aware of whats going on. If nobody from your group showed up, I'm sorry, but we gave them ample time to find a replacement. You can be prepared as these meetings will come up for each major milestone during our development cycle. If you want, we can probably embed this information into the schedule pages that John creates, it's not like those aren't busy enough as they are (: -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list