On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Robin Norwood wrote: > On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Nope, the terms of use are already pretty clear. And no one has provided > > a compelling reason to keep these projects around, just lots of > > suggestions on how to keep them around. Deleted is what we want, not > > delisted or saved forever or anything like that. We're not going to > > commit any resources to a project that choosed not to use this free > > service. > > Well, because sooner or later, you'll delete a project that someone > didn't want deleted, and they'll be ticked off. Maybe they'll open a > ticket and convince the infra. team to restore the data from a backup, > or maybe they'll just be ticked off and rant about how much Fedora > sucks for deleting this thing they didn't want deleted. > I'm fine with that. Its well documented. and its not like we're going to rm -rf the thing. We'll keep it around for a while but no promises. > Again, I'm assuming the per-project maintenence cost is near zero (ie, > a little bit of disk space). If not, then maybe I could see a case > for automatically deleting old projects. > Ah, thats an incorrect assumption. -Mike _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
